
Swiffer has been aggressively targeting mommy bloggers, including a Swiffer SocialLuxe Lounge at the BlogHer conference this past summer.
Most recently, P&G launched an updated Swiffer WetJet and is targeting mommy bloggers to participate in mission Operation: Enduring Clean. The mommy bloggers received a very elaborate attaché case that provided the information and tools to complete their “mission”. 
While this may look to be a very exciting campaign and get the mommy bloggers all jazzed up to complete their mission, it seems some mommy bloggers were more eager to write about the delivery, than the actual product itself.
Was it necessary for Swiffer to spend this type of marketing dollars to get mommy bloggers to participate? No. Would they have achieved the same or better results with out all the gimmicks? More than likely.
Don’t get me wrong, I love the idea. But based on my experience working with mommy bloggers, this campaign was a bit over the top and some of the key messages were lost because the product wasn’t the hero.
Okay, so the CEO of Whole Foods recently spoke his mind in the Wall Street Journal about the proposed healthcare reforms. Blah, blah, blah. And now customers are up in arms – protesting and picketing and boycotting and twittering and joining Facebook pages. Blah, blah, blah.
Apparently John Mackey had the audacity to remind Americans that healthcare is not a birthright. Agree or disagree, he still has the right to free speech. And so too do the customers and union members and anyone else who wants to pile on. Hey, this is still America, land of the free, home of the brave. Everyone has rights.
But how in the name of the Liberty Bell is this a “PR Crisis”?
According to BBC News:
Seemingly caught off-guard by the unfolding PR crisis, Whole Foods sought to distance itself from its chief executive’s comments.
“We’ve had a lot of emails and phone calls and people coming into our stores to talk about it,” said Libba Letton, spokeswoman for Whole Foods. “Our top priority is addressing their concerns.”
But public relations experts criticised the store for bungling its response.
“You have two choices: you either take a proactive approach and wade right in and sort it out or you sit back and wait,” said Erica Iacono, executive editor of industry magazine PR Week. “The company seems to be taking a wait and see approach and hoping it goes away. It’s a mistake.”
By the way, not to accuse the BBC of being sensational, but Erica Iacono is the only “PR expert” referenced in the story. And nothing personal, but how exactly is Erica Iacono an expert on this matter?
Regardless, none of that matters. In fact, none of any of this should matter.
Mackey spoke his mind and now the marketplace is speaking its mind and the chips will fall where they will. I mean really, what do the protestors and the twitterers expect? Do you want Mackey to recant? And if he does, will those words be “real” or calculated? And then you have to ask yourself what you really want: the truth or something else?
In today’s digital environment, can the use of traditional publicity and media relations still be an effective strategy to increase sales?
By Jim Sweeney
Traditional publicity and media relations is a broad strategy that if properly targeted and effectively implemented can achieve – or at least support the achievement of – virtually any marketing/communications objective, including increasing sales.
To be sure, there are certainly more effective marketing, advertising and public relations strategies to directly impact sales. But the value of traditional publicity and media relations – to create awareness, build brand and establish credibility for a company, product or service – should never be underestimated.
Despite the growth of online media – both news and social – the vast majority of consumers in the U.S. continue to spend more time watching TV, listening to radio and reading newspapers and magazines than they do on the Internet.
In fact, the real difficulty in using traditional publicity and media relations to drive sales, is often the ability and/or willingness to measure the impact of the results – media coverage. Whether you are selling products nationwide at multiple retail locations or promoting your new restaurant in Wilmington, NC, it is extremely challenging (and usually cost-prohibitive) to track magazine, newspaper and broadcast coverage, then connect that coverage with sales (unless of course your product appears on Oprah).
Depending upon your desire and ability, you can apply some basic metrics:
1. You can easily document deliverables (e.g., media database, press materials, media calls, product sample distributions).
2. You can easily measure results (e.g., numbers of interviews, quantity and quality of coverage, consumer impressions).
3. You can even account for some corresponding “sales” activity (e.g.,direct links to your web site, spikes in web site and/or store traffic, incoming calls to a designated phone number).
Beyond this, your metrics and your measurement strategies must be a bit more sophisticated and costly. Still, making the hard connection between publicity and media relations is doable. Unfortunately it requires time and money that most marketers prefer to put back into the campaign.
Is it an effective strategy? You bet.
__________________________________________________
Have a marketing, public relations, social media or advertising question? Post your question below or email exeqnation at gmail dot com. We are committed to answering your marketing questions real time. And if we don’t know the answer, we’ll contact one of our valued partners who will.
We know Sam Walton. We respect Jim Sinegal. We admire Sol Price. But there was another retail giant – a true pioneer – who is too often forgotten or overlooked in today’s crowded marketplace: John F. Geisse. To know John Geisse is to love him.
Father of 10, dutiful husband to wife Mary, hardworking man, devoted citizen. That is John Geisse. Of course he also founded and launched the Target stores, the Venture chain and The Wholesale Club (which was sold in 1991 to his friend Sam Walton and became Sam’s Club).
In as much as I helped write John’s obituary, I could tell you a good portion of the story of his life, but I prefer to focus instead on a single chapter – the chapter I know best – The Wholesale Club years.
I first Met John Geisse and his son Tom when they visited Cleveland in 1982 to discuss the opening of their second membership warehouse club and their first unit in Ohio. They were looking for an agency to help them make connections and build awareness and generate traffic. But really, John was just looking for someone he could trust.
Somehow our paths crossed. I was only 26 at the time and John was barely 60, though he had more energy on his worst day than I had on my best. John Geisse was full of life and it showed in our first meeting. As he revealed to a group of us what the membership warehouse concept was all about – a new retail idea formulated by Sol Price on the west coast – we were already drooling at the opportunity to be involved on the ground floor of a business that was sure to succeed.
And it wasn’t that Mr. Geisse was so convincing, though he was, it was that he was so passionate, so invested, so involved. He loved the very idea of what he was doing. Having opened his first unit in Carmel earlier that year, he was ready to explode his idea across the Midwest. And sure enough, over the course of the next eight to nine years, we worked our way through Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Illinois, opening more than 30 100,000-square-foot membership warehouses. In less than a decade, John Geisse had created a billion-dollar business.
And John was there every step of the way. Scouting locations. Meeting with civic and business leaders. Meeting with the media. Meeting with prospective business members. Meeting with the community. Preaching the gospel of The Wholesale Club. But nothing was more important to John Geisse than his customers. He was a showman and a businessman creating a nationally recognized and respected retail operation. Still, he never took his eye off the prize.
I recall one particular grand opening, which John Geisse always presided over, like a pastor leading his flock. Shortly after the speeches and the ribbon-cutting, the doors were opened and the curious flooded into the store. John was giving a tour and interview to a reporter of the daily newspaper when he spotted out of the corner of his eye a new member attempting to remove a 20-pound box of detergent from an overhead shelf. John cut off the interview in mid-sentence and ran to the aid of the customer, never even bothering to introduce himself as an inductee of the Discount Hall of Fame or the founder of this company.
In truth, John Geisse never really cared so much for the accolade as he did the pure fun of making someone smile.
Sam Walton once said of John Geisse,”I have never known anyone else that I respected more for many things, including integrity, morality and the way he cared for his associates.”
John Geisse died at the age of 71 nearly two decades ago. It was his illness that forced him to sell the business to Sam Walton, his close and trusted friend. I think of John Geisse often. He was more than a great man, he was a good man.
Gap is using its 40th anniversary celebration to get back to its roots – jeans. With sales slipping, this might prove to be a good move.
In honor of the retailer’s 40th anniversary, it is hosting a jean party nationwide to promote its 1969 new premium jean line. On Thursday, August 20th from 7 – 9 p.m. every Gap store nationwide will host an exclusive, live acoustic music night with special promotions of course (15% off your entire purchase and $20 off your favorite jeans).
Additionally, the campaign called Born to Fit features a Facebook page, a StyleMixer iPhone application (yep… there is an app for helping you mix and match clothes), pop up stores and advertising. 
This marketing campaign is a very strategic approach to invigorate the brand and sales – from a new product line, to a new campaign to store promotions and social media. Gap isn’t just saying… yeah we are 40. The company is giving you a reason to listen and participate.
As bloggers and Twitterers become the new “celebrities” tapped by organizations to drive messages to the masses, when do they cross the line and become the very shills they once so willingly and joyfully persecuted?
Here’s the answer: Immediately.
There is absolutely NO difference between bloggers, Twitterers or public relations professionals who for various reasons (cash, gifts, ego) represent a product manufacturer or service provider. And it happens every day.
Procter & Gamble does it all the time; bringing bloggers and Twitterers into its headquarters or hosting events and showering them with product samples… and more. Take this recent story from the New York Times…
“To harness the viral marketing of social media, Procter & Gamble sponsored an event last week before the BlogHer 2009 conference in Chicago to present its updated Swiffer Wet Jet cleaning mop, which will be shipped to stores around Aug. 1. The company was the title sponsor of the Swiffer SocialLuxe Lounge, billed as a pampering party. More than 500 BlogHer participants stopped by on Thursday afternoon, which offered makeovers, a blogging awards presentation and stations to recharge phones and hand-held devices.”
Roche recently held a Diabetes Social Media Summit at its headquarters. The company flew about 30 bloggers into its Indianapolis headquarters for a day and a half long event. Rachel Baumgartel, a Diabetes blogger who did not make it, offered these thoughts:
“I admit it. I was invited. I chose not to go, mainly because of lack of vacation days after family obligations and BlogHer. A little part of me questioned the intentions of this pharmaceutical company and the money spent on such event. You see, I used to be an administrative assistant at a medical device manufacturer and was on a planning committee for a marketing tour for directors of nursing, purchasing managers, and other hospital administrators. I know how much money is spent on these type of events. Even with corporate cafeteria lunches, it’s still a pretty penny – a pretty penny that should be used to bring down the cost of test strips.”
Earlier this month, PepsiCo, parent company of the Mountain Dew soda brand, rented out a bowling alley to throw a “taste test” party for its new “Ultraviolet” diet soda. And the guest list had been amassed not for its red-carpet potential, but Twitter influence. Here, CNET reports:
“Not only do Twitter’s uber-chatty twentysomethings want everyone to know exactly what they’re doing at the trendiest bowling alley in Brooklyn’s trendiest neighborhood, but their friends will probably listen — they, after all, want to know what’s going on.
And savvy brands have found that even if profits aren’t clear-cut, they can use that Twitter buzz to keep up a loyal following — even with a small base — rather than to broadcast a brand’s hashtag all over the Web and hope for profits.”
Here’s what Merriam-Webster says:
Main Entry: shill
Pronunciation: \ˈshil\
1 : to act as a shill
2 : to act as a spokesperson or promoter
Here’s what Harry Chapin says:
And as I hung up the phone it occurred to me
He’d grown up just like me
My boy was just like me
And the cat’s in the cradle and the silver spoon
Little boy blue and the man on the moon
When you comin’ home son?
I don’t know when, but we’ll get together then son
You know we’ll have a good time then
Why are media not responding to my news release or pitch?
___________________________________________________
By Jennifer Manocchio
Just because media does not respond, that does not mean the media contacts are not interested in your message. In fact, there are numerous reasons why media may not respond to your news release, pitch, press kit, etc.
1. Too much to review; not enough time: Media receive hundreds of emails, phone calls, voicemails, envelops and faxes a day. It is impossible for media to respond to every single piece of communication they receive, whether they are interested or not. Otherwise, they would never get their stories completed on time.
2. Not a fit for their beat: Your news release or pitch may not be the best fit for their beat. While media database programs like Vocus, BurrellesLuce and Cision help identify beats, their contacts are not 100% accurate (in most cases they are only about 50% accurate). Also, in light of all the media layoffs and publication closings, reporters are taking on additional beats or new beats. The most effective way to ensure you have the best contact is to double-check the news outlets’ web site or simply call to confirm the contact.
3. Holding for future use: Media often hold onto news releases, media kits, pitches, etc. for future use. Perhaps the information might be a good fit for an industry round-up story. Or your story is “evergreen” and can wait. One way to reduce this from happening is to tie your story into current events, holidays, seasons, etc.
4. No additional information needed: This is a good scenario because it confirms all the important facts were included in your media communication. Also, reporters often do not have time to conduct interviews or chase down pertinent information, especially when they already have what they need.
5. Did not receive release, press kit or pitch: Spam filters are the biggest culprits. Be sure your email communication does not include spam words. Check http://workyourleads.net/archives/82 for a list of words that trigger spam filters. Other forms of communication like faxes and even snail mail can get lost in the sea of paper media receive.
6. Email subject line or headline wasn’t interesting: The media have very limited time and are typically on deadline. Therefore, they scan email subject lines and news release and pitch headlines to determine if they should read on. Be sure your email subject lines, news release and pitch headlines are short, catchy and relevant.
7. Not interested in your story: Sometimes you may have what you think is the best story, but the media contact is just not that interested for one reason or another. However, keep in mind that just because one media outlet is not interested, does not mean another reporter will not bite. Different media are interested in different stories at different times.
___________________________________________________
Have a marketing, public relations, social media or advertising question? Post your question below or email exeqnation at gmail dot com. We are committed to answering your marketing questions real time. And if we don’t know the answer, we’ll contact one of our valued partners who will.
Consumers have been selling used cars, boats, vans, etc. on eBay for some time. In fact, about 6 or 7 years ago, a client of ours purchased a fleet of work vans from eBay. My husband even drove to Alabama (I refused to go) to get a boat he purchased off eBay a few years ago. However, it came as quite a shock to me that GM is selling new cars on eBay. The program is currently limited to California, but GM hopes to expand it nationwide.
Industry opponents argue that people will still want to go to the dealership to see, feel and drive a new car. That is true if a consumer doesn’t know what he or she wants, but if you know exactly what you want to purchase, why not try the eBay model? You really don’t have anything to lose. According to an article in The Washington Post the “buy it now” price will be less than the sticker price, but will be set by individual dealers.
GM has actually selected an opportune time to test the online model with online retail sales expected to hit $156 billion in 2009 (an 11% growth over 2008) according to Forrester.
Americans have grown accustom to purchasing consumer products online. Even products where personal attention is important, like prescription drugs or medical supplies, or products where touching and feeling is important, like furniture and jewelry has not stopped consumers from purchasing these products online. I suspect this will be the same case with purchasing cars off the Internet. It will be the right fit for some, but others will still prefer the dealerships. However, we will likely see this online model become more common among car manufacturers.
Yeah, I know, you’ve heard this a thousand times. But are you listening? Are you hearing?
Now more than ever – with the economy crimping budgets, the number of strategic options exponentially growing and the demand for measurable results ever increasing – testing is mandatory.
And yet…
Marketers continue to invest meaningful dollars into campaigns they are uncertain will work when they could just as easily test them first. Print advertising, radio advertising, TV advertising, online advertising, direct mail, e-mail, publicity, blogger relations, even trade shows and events – everything can and should be tested before diving headfirst into the water.
Because what worked yesterday, may not work today and may not work tomorrow. We are currently living and working in a period of unprecedented “media” change. Virtually every day brings a new channel, a new opportunity and another way to spend (and potentially throw away) money.
Consider your own experiences over the past year. Should our organization have a Facebook account? Can social media work in our B2B environment? Can we use Twitter to market our products? Is newspaper advertising a bad investment? Should our CEO write a blog? Do enough people follow traditional media to justify a publicity campaign? Can we still build brand with online advertising? If we do PPC, do we still need organic search? Are trade shows going the way of the dinosaurs?
And on and on and on. And the answer is: Yes, no, maybe.
For many organizations, budget limitations can severly hamper their ability to establish and maintain a truly diversified marketing mix (they can’t do everything). For others, budget is not an issue at all. But for both, the quality of your investment will determine the value of your return.
There is a better way: Test first, act second.
I’m a living sunset
Lightning in my bones
Push me to the edge
But my will is stone
‘Cause I believe in a better way
Fools will be fools
And wise will be wise
But I will look this world
Straight in the eyes
I believe in a better way
I believe there’s a better way
Is mass media advertising dead? Are there so many targeted options that I shouldn’t use it? Conversely, is mass media so splintered and difficult to measure that I shouldn’t use it? (e.g. broadcast, cable and satellite television)
Associate Vice President, University Communications and Marketing
_______________________________________________________________________
By Jennifer Manocchio
Mass media advertising is not dead. TV still remains king of all media and should still be considered a sound advertising strategy. Consider these facts:
While mass media is difficult (costly) to measure compared to other strategies, some goals are difficult to measure no matter how targeted the strategy. So let’s break this down:
If your goal is to create awareness and build brand, mass media fits the bill. You can reach hundreds or thousands or hundreds of millions and make initial connections and build credibility. And yes, Virginia, you can measure the results. But you must be willing to invest in benchmark and follow-up research.
If your goal is to drive web site traffic or increase calls into a toll-free number or push consumers into a retail outlet, mass media also works; it’s just a different approach to messaging and creative. It’s not so much about the brand as it is the offer.
Can you use targeted strategies to do the same thing? Yes. Can you even use them in combination? Yes. Is there a “best” solution? Probably, but that depends on each individual situation. There is never a single right answer; this is not a shelf service business.
On any given day, for any given situation, mass media and/or targeted media may be the best solution. There is no easy answer. And by the way, measurement is a requirement for both strategies.
But mass media is not dead and in fact, will likely never die. It will continue to evolve as it has for the past century (we are including radio and film along with TV here). Even media geniuses like Jason Kilar acknowledge that people will continue to want to sit around their living rooms or at local establishments and share “shows” and “events” and “news”, if for no other reason than to socialize and have something to talk about around the water cooler the next day. Only mass media can provide that experience.
_____________________________________________________
Have a marketing, public relations, social media or advertising question? Post your question below or email exeqnation at gmail dot com. We are committed to answering your marketing questions real time. And if we don’t know the answer, we’ll contact one of our valued partners who will.
Once upon a time, the answer to this question was: “What day is it?” Now it is more like the weather in Chicago: “Wait a minute, it’ll change.” Most consumers want whatever they can get; in a perfect world, they want everything – great product, great price, great service, great delivery, great warranty, plus free stuff just for being a customer.
If you are a product manufacturer or a retailer, this order would seem to be tall, but potentially achievable… until you start adding in the extras: Do you have it in another color? Do you have it in a smaller size? Can I get this with an alternate energy source? Is this available in an environmentally friendly version? Can I take it home today and return it a year from now if it shows wear and tear?
Consider the electronic book or digital reader. Not so long ago (like today), Kindle was the only real choice for consumers who wanted to read an electronic book. As it turns out, most of the current consumers are business people. It is kind of pricey because there is no real competition and because volume is still relatively low (supply and demand). And you have to buy it through Amazon (not a lot of flexibility here).
And just when sales start to pick up, Apple leaks that it will soon have its own hip version of the e-book reader. And then Sony jumps into the ring with equally cool, but cheaper versions. And suddenly consumers have more options – size, price, appearance, functions, availability, brand, etc. – than they ever could have hoped for. And the story is all over the media and all over the Internet. And consumers are blogging and tweeting and texting and getting themselves all in a lather. A tsunami wave of excitement will fuel huge sales, and everyone will soon be sporting e-book fanny packs and shoulder slings.
But back to reality. There currently is only one option available (Kindle) and most consumers have no idea what a Kindle or an e-book reader is. And once they find out, most – especially in this economic environment – will deem it to be unaffordable (at least until it becomes cool and a status symbol).
In short, even though they don’t know it yet, consumers will soon want an e-book or digital reader and everything that goes with it. That’s the way we roll in America.
Which reminds me of the last line in the final scene of The Candidate, when Bill McKay (Robert Redford) realizes that he just won the election that he isn’t sure he really wants: “What do we do now?”
Just last week 1-800-Flowers announced it was the first to launch a storefront on Facebook. Now 20 more storefronts are in the works according to an article in the Financial Times. 
This news has me a bit perplexed. Facebook is a networking site where 250 million users go to connect with friends, family and co-workers. Connecting with companies, brands, and non-profits all comes secondary. This is precisely where storefronts will fall… secondary to connecting and staying in touch with people.
I believe it is highly unlikely consumers will join Facebook or log in just to purchase a product unless of course there is a special deal tied into the Facebook storefront. Why purchase from Facebook when I can simply go to the retailer’s e-commerce site and order there? Especially in the case where I have already created an account on the retailer’s site, which saves me time by eliminating the need to enter my shipping and credit card information.
The biggest roadblock is the state of mind people are in when they go to Facebook. I don’t believe any retailer is going to change that mind set. Retailers might make some sales initially since “mavens” (according to The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell, people who have market influence and do things before they become popular) will want to try it just because it is new. However, my prediction is the cost and manpower to run the storefront will not be worth the investment.